Re: [AMC-list] 4 barrel intake for a 290

[Jim Blair <carnuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I keep hearing that yet the most I see is about 10% difference. Less than that on a higher compression engine unless your LPG is cut with Butane. E85 runs 20-30% lower economy. 

From: Ken Ames <ameskg@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Rambler AMC, Nash, Jeep and family" <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AMC-list] 4 barrel intake for a 290
Message-ID:
   <1592731284.4333695.1423780246864.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

But don't you have to use more gallons of LPG compared to gasoline to go the same distance? 
Or am I thinking of a different fuel? 

Ken 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Blair" <carnuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "amc" <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 12:23:50 PM
Subject: Re: [AMC-list] 4 barrel intake for a 290

I agree on SP2P for a 290 or 304 unless you want to build a redlining power monster. I plan on using one on my 304 I'm going to run on LPG (price just dropped to $1.75 a gallon here) and I'm considering one on the 290 that's going into my '68 Travelall, if I ever feel well enough again to do anything to my vehicles. 

Sent from my iPhone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.amc-list.com/pipermail/amc-list-amc-list.com/attachments/20150213/aab13591/attachment.htm>
_______________________________________________
AMC-list mailing list
AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com