RE: [gremlintime] 78 gremlin
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [gremlintime] 78 gremlin
- From: "Lightfoot, Frederick J Jr (Rick)" <LightfooFJ2@xxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 08:49:44 -0400
Yes, you are correct. The '73's aren't too bad to correct the governments
mistakes regarding 5 mph bumpers.
> ----------
> From: baad73grem@xxxx[SMTP:baad73grem@xxxx]
> Reply To: gremlintime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 10:53 PM
> To: gremlintime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gremlintime] 78 gremlin
>
> In a message dated 8/7/01 8:01:34 PM SA Pacific Standard Time,
> LightfooFJ2@xxxx writes:
>
>
> > I think 1970-72 were the best years closely followed by 1973.
> > Rick Lightfoot
>
> >
> >
> >
>
> I agree,the only thing that sucks about 73's is that the bumpers are stuck
>
> out by brackets to make em meet that years crash safety.and when the
> plastic
> dividers get sun brittle and break off they leave that gaping"Caddy coupe
>
> deville ass end"look that i hated so i wanted to make mine look like a
> 70-72
> by using a 70-72 rear and front bumper and their brackets and by drilling
> holes towards the ends in the back up and over style like the 70-72 grems
> and
> weld patches of metal towards the middle where the 73s brackets were
> bolted
> in side by side now my bumpers are flush with the body like a 70-72 grem
> :)
> Bart Mangrum
> 73 Gremlin"with the 70-72 Look" 360
> Ft.Pierce Fl.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Community email addresses:
> Post message: gremlintime@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subscribe: gremlintime-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: gremlintime-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
> List owner: gremlintime-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Shortcut URL to this page:
> http://www.onelist.com/community/gremlintime
> Gremlintime(Home of the AMC Gremlin on the WWW):
> http://www.geocities.com/gremlintime
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin