Send AMC-List mailing list submissions to amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to amc-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx You can reach the person managing the list at amc-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of AMC-List digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: I-Pod, MP3, MP4, Poket PC's..... Sattelite! (Glen Hoag) 2. Re: I Pod Definition (Kim Bueler) 3. Re: I Pod Definition (Tom Jennings) 4. Fw: Temp sending unit question (Jay) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 10:04:56 -0500 From: Glen Hoag <hoag@xxxxxx> Subject: Re: [AMC-List] I-Pod, MP3, MP4, Poket PC's..... Sattelite! To: amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <a06230926c0c8a794076e@[192.168.123.144]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Actually, the iPod plays MP3 files just fine. The iTunes application can play MP3s and rip your CDs to either MP3 or MPEG4 based AAC. The iTunes Music Store sells music in AAC only, because it supports Apple's proprietary FairPlay Digital Rights Management (DRM) scheme. >OK, so an Ipod actually doesn't play MP3's... it plays >a proprietary format called MP4 which locks you into >their system. For those who have been captured and >are looking for a way out due to a desire to change >formats there is a software package called "Bad Apple" >that allows for translation. > >Many people with I Pods have experinced a failure >after 14-16 months... in fact you seem more likley to >have a failure if you failed to buy the extended >warranty, so if you buy one get the warranty! The new >ones play videos, have a contact manager and other >cool features, but they're not the only options out >there. > >I prefer the pocket PC's which can run windows >programs, movies and play MP3's and can be plugged in >or transmited just like an I Pod. > >I like my Sirius sattelite radio as I can listen to >the same stations all over the country and I can hear >more than music... comedy, sports etc... I am not >even a big sports fan, but today I was even able to >listen to WImbledon coverage! > >Well, there's my .02! > > > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >http://mail.yahoo.com >_______________________________________________ >AMC-List mailing list >AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx >http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list > >or go to http://www.amc-list.com -- Glen Hoag '75 Pacer 258 (x3) hoag@xxxxxx '76 Pacer 258 (for parts) Limestone County, Alabama '77 Pacer 258 (for kids) '80 Pacer 258 DL wagon '81 Concord DL 258 AMO #7895 AMCPC #471 '82 Spirit 151 ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 13:09:40 -0400 From: "Kim Bueler" <kimbueler@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [AMC-List] I Pod Definition To: <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <001e01c69b9e$cf1648c0$6601a8c0@p4> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original I think everyone kinda missed my message amongst all the poo pooing going on over the IPOD. The machine itself isn't a complete marvel, there are a lot of MP3 players out there, but the fact remains the support of other manufactures for IPOD accessories, etc, speaks volumes, the IPOD sells well, works the way it supposed to, seamlessly allows you to put music in places you couldn't before and MOST IMPORTANT IT IS SIMPLE. You don't have to own it, you won't be any cooler if you have one (remember 8 tracks and cassette players folks- everyone had to have one!), we have two in our house and neither has broken I have a 15 yr old daughter that constantly breaks things. It does not necessarily require illegal downloaded music, I put my own purchased music on my son's IPOD thank you. But it is new technology that doesn't require a lot of investment. I misspoke before regarding price, you get an IPOD nano on ebay right now for about $120. The nano can hold about 240 songs, and with a cheap FM transmitter say another $40 you have a great system for little money, that is PORTABLE, take it anywhere and works on any FM radio - sorry AM people but you will be out of luck, unless your AM radio has a mic or aux jack, then you would still be in business. It is not the panacea for everything you're looking for, there is no need to spend a lot of money, it does the trick plain and simple, I wasn't trying to convert anyone on the list but like I said, it worked great for me and I thought I would share it with others. Obligatory statement regarding my opinion: "I'm not affiliated with IPOD, Apple or any other manufactures." Best Regards, Kim Bueler - '75 Gremlin X 360 V8 - IPOD equipped! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mr. AMC" <AMC74Hornet@xxxxxxxxx> To: <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 6:26 AM Subject: [AMC-List] I Pod Definition > Thanks to all who answered my question on the I Pod definition. I > thought Tom Jennings was the most colorful and right to the point. I > guess my Hornet will not be cool without one then? ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:15:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [AMC-List] I Pod Definition To: amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606291511150.4814@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Kim Bueler wrote: > I think everyone kinda missed my message amongst all the poo pooing going on > over the IPOD. Sorry if I lent weight to that. I was just funnin' w/the iPod. They, and the workalikes, are incredible things. They've created podcast culture and all, which I love. As is obvious to anyone who owns anything electrical, they come with hidden costs (cables, annoying tiny headphones, software hassles, falls out of pocket into toilet, etc) but if you're careful it's all totally worthwhile. 2000+ songs, plays for 6 - 12 hours on a single battery charge, instant on and selection, no removable media... what's not to like! ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:34:45 -0400 From: "Jay" <jciampi@xxxxxxxx> Subject: [AMC-List] Fw: Temp sending unit question To: "AMC LIST" <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <014b01c69bd4$9b683e30$399b1ecf@Ciampi> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original I measured the resitance of the center contact on rthe sensor with the gauge cable connected to it and it read 38 ohms.(cold engine). That till isn't 70 ohms. Subject: [AMC-List] Temp sending unit question > My 1966 TSM says that the temp sending unit should read 70 ohms when cold > and 120 ohms when 212 degrees. I measured my new unit and the old unit > after > removing it from the engine and NEITHER one reads anywhere near 70 ohms > cold. I get 268 ohms cold with the old one and about 258 ohms on the new > one. That is reading it from the electrical connector to the brass sensor > that goes into the block. What am I doing wrong. The TSM doesn't anything > about whether the gauge wire has to be connected to the unit while it is > screwed into place. > > Jay > > _______________________________________________ > AMC-List mailing list > AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list > > or go to http://www.amc-list.com > ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ AMC-List mailing list AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list End of AMC-List Digest, Vol 5, Issue 61 ***************************************